Anti-Human HER2 (Pertuzumab) – Fc Muted™

Anti-Human HER2 (Pertuzumab) – Fc Muted™

Product No.: H295

- -
- -
Product No.H295
Clone
2C4
Target
HER-2/neu
Product Type
Biosimilar Recombinant Human Monoclonal Antibody
Alternate Names
ERBB2, CD340, NGL, TKR1
Isotype
Human IgG1κ
Applications
ELISA
,
FA
,
N

- -
- -
Select Product Size
- -
- -

Antibody Details

Product Details

Reactive Species
Human
Host Species
Human
Expression Host
HEK-293 Cells
FC Effector Activity
Muted
Recommended Isotype Controls
Immunogen
Humanized antibody derived from mouse clone 2C4.
Product Concentration
≥ 5.0 mg/ml
Endotoxin Level
< 1.0 EU/mg as determined by the LAL method
Purity
≥95% by SDS Page
≥95% monomer by analytical SEC
Formulation
This biosimilar antibody is aseptically packaged and formulated in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (150 mM NaCl) PBS pH 7.2 - 7.4 with no carrier protein, potassium, calcium or preservatives added. Due to inherent biochemical properties of antibodies, certain products may be prone to precipitation over time. Precipitation may be removed by aseptic centrifugation and/or filtration.
State of Matter
Liquid
Product Preparation
Recombinant biosimilar antibodies are manufactured in an animal free facility using only in vitro protein free cell culture techniques and are purified by a multi-step process including the use of protein A or G to assure extremely low levels of endotoxins, leachable protein A or aggregates.
Storage and Handling
Functional grade preclinical antibodies may be stored sterile as received at 2-8°C for up to one month. For longer term storage, aseptically aliquot in working volumes without diluting and store at ≤ -70°C. Avoid Repeated Freeze Thaw Cycles.
Regulatory Status
Research Use Only (RUO). Non-Therapeutic.
Country of Origin
USA
Shipping
2-8°C Wet Ice
Additional Applications Reported In Literature ?
ELISA
FA
N
IP
IF
FC
Antagonist
Each investigator should determine their own optimal working dilution for specific applications. See directions on lot specific datasheets, as information may periodically change.

Description

Description

Specificity
This non-therapeutic biosimilar antibody uses the same variable region sequence as the therapeutic antibody Pertuzumab. This product is for research use only. Pertuzumab binds specifically to human and cynomolgus HER2 near the center of extracellular domain II of the dimerization arm, adjacent to the binding pocket used for receptor dimerization.
Background
HER2 (ERBB2) is a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate cell growth, survival and differentiation 1,2. HER2 activates downstream signaling pathways by forming a heterodimer with other ligand-bound EGF receptor family members (EGF receptor, HER3, HER4). Dysregulation of HER2 contributes to tumorigenesis in breast, ovarian, gastric, and other cancers 1. Additionally, HER2-HER3 heterodimers are potent signaling dimers required for HER2-mediated cancer cell proliferation 3.

Pertuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancers that have either HER2 protein overexpression or ERBB2 gene amplification 2. Pertuzumab blocks HER2 function as a coreceptor by sterically inhibiting its heterodimerization with other HER family members, including EGF receptor, HER3, and HER4 3,4,5,6. As a result, HER2’s ability to activate pathways associated with cancer cell proliferation and survival is limited 2. Additionally, when pertuzumab binds to a cancer cell, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity is triggered.

Pertuzumab is a full-length, chimeric IgG1 antibody generated by cloning VLκI and VHIII of murine 2C4 into a vector containing human kappa and CH1 domains 7. Pertuzumab was initially expressed and purified as a Fab from E. coli for residue optimization and subsequently was stably produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Contact between pertuzumab and HER2 occurs at the HER2 heterodimerization interface 4 and is primarily made with the heavy chain of the antibody fragment, with a small contribution from the light chain 8. Additionally, Leu295 and His296 are important for binding.
Antigen Distribution
HER2 is ubiquitously expressed in epithelial, mesenchymal, and neuronal cells and their cellular progenitors. It is mostly localized to the plasma membrane and is generally excluded from clathrin-coated pits.
Ligand/Receptor
EGF receptors, SHC1, c-Src, Integrin B4, Grb2, SOS1, JAK2
NCBI Gene Bank ID
UniProt.org
Research Area
Biomarker
.
Biosimilars
.
Cancer
.
Immunology

Leinco Antibody Advisor

Powered by AI: AI is experimental and still learning how to provide the best assistance. It may occasionally generate incorrect or incomplete responses. Please do not rely solely on its recommendations when making purchasing decisions or designing experiments.

Research-grade Pertuzumab biosimilars are employed as calibration standards or reference controls in pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging ELISAs to enable quantitative measurement of Pertuzumab concentrations in serum samples by establishing a traceable and reproducible standard curve. This is essential for both drug monitoring and biosimilar comparability studies.

How Pertuzumab Biosimilars Are Used in PK Bridging ELISA:

  • Calibration Standard: A single, well-characterized Pertuzumab biosimilar can be selected as the analytical standard for assay calibration. Serial dilutions of the biosimilar standard are prepared in a matrix-matched solution (such as human or animal serum), and

The primary in vivo models for assessing research-grade anti-HER-2/neu antibody effects on tumor growth and characterizing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are syngeneic mouse models expressing HER2/neu (either murine or humanized forms) and, to a lesser extent, humanized or chimeric models.

Key model types:

  • Syngeneic mouse models with murine HER2/neu (neu)
    These models use immunocompetent mice (commonly BALB/c) implanted with mouse tumor cell lines (e.g., TUBO, MMC) naturally expressing or engineered to express the rat or mouse HER2/neu oncogene.

    • A frequently cited antibody is 7.16.4, an anti-neu monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor growth by both direct effects and Fcγ receptor (FcR)-mediated mechanisms, including activation of adaptive immunity and promoting TIL infiltration.
    • The immune status of the model enables study of both innate and adaptive immune cell recruitment and function within the TME, including TIL profiling (CD4+, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, etc.).
    • Wild-type and immune knockout mice (e.g., FcγR KO) are often used as comparators to dissect immune mechanisms.
  • Human HER2-expressing syngeneic models
    Since human HER2 differs from mouse/rat neu, special syngeneic mouse models have been engineered to express human HER2 in mouse tumor cells (e.g., 4T1.2-HER2T).

    • This enables use of clinically relevant human anti-HER2 antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab or antibody-drug conjugates like T-DM1/Kadcyla) in an immune-competent mouse setting.
    • These models allow evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, tumor inhibition, and immune cell (including TIL) infiltration and activation after antibody administration.
    • Models have been created in breast, colorectal, and ovarian contexts using the HER2T system.
  • (Less commonly) Humanized or xenograft models
    Xenografts of human HER2+ cell lines in immunodeficient mice are popular for preclinical efficacy, but are suboptimal for immune profiling because the hosts lack a functional adaptive immune system.

    • To study TILs, humanized mouse models (e.g., NSG mice reconstituted with human immune cells) are sometimes used but remain less common due to complexity and cost.
Model TypeHER2/neu SourceImmune SystemUsesCommon Antibody
Syngeneic (mouse/rat neu)Murine/rat neuMouse-native (intact)TIL characterization, tumor inhibition7.16.4, similar
Syngeneic (human HER2 transgene)Human HER2Mouse-native (intact)Human antibody response, TIL enumerationTrastuzumab, T-DM1
Humanized xenograftHuman HER2 (human cell)Humanized/adaptiveLimited; complex, costly, less commonTrastuzumab, etc.

Summary of key applications:

  • Anti-HER-2/neu antibody is most often tested in syngeneic mouse models (TUBO, MMC, 4T1.2-HER2T, etc.) to study tumor growth inhibition and robust TIL responses.
  • These models enable analysis of immune mechanisms (ADCC, T cell influx, antigen spreading) and dependence on Fc receptor interactions.
  • Humanized HER2 models allow testing of clinical human antibodies in immunocompetent settings, providing a platform for TIL characterization in response to therapeutically relevant reagents.

For detailed analyses of TILs post-treatment, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry are typically used to enumerate and phenotype CD4+, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, and other immune populations infiltrating tumors.

Researchers investigating synergistic effects in immune-oncology models use the pertuzumab biosimilar primarily in the context of HER2-positive cancers, often in combination with other targeted therapies or chemotherapies, but combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3—especially biosimilars—is a cutting-edge and emerging research area with limited direct published data.

Essential context and supporting details:

  • Pertuzumab biosimilars (such as KM118 or QL1209) have well-established equivalency in efficacy and safety to the original pertuzumab (Perjeta) for HER2-positive cancers, especially breast cancer, making them suitable for use in broader research applications due to improved accessibility and reduced cost.

  • Combination rationale: In immune-oncology, combining agents with different mechanisms—like HER2-directed antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors—aims to exploit potential synergy:

    • HER2 blockade (via pertuzumab biosimilars) disrupts tumor cell growth signaling.
    • Checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-CTLA-4, anti-LAG-3 biosimilars) release the brakes on immune activation, enabling enhanced T-cell mediated tumor destruction.
  • Mechanistic hypothesis: Combining these agents could potentially improve anti-tumor immune responses by both increasing tumor cell susceptibility (via growth signal disruption) and boosting immune system activity (via checkpoint blockade).

  • Preclinical and translational research: Most studies examining multi-checkpoint blockade describe combinations like anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4. The review of current strategies indicates such combinations are tested in early-phase clinical and preclinical models to:

    • Assess pharmacodynamic synergy (e.g., enhanced T-cell infiltration, reduced regulatory T cells, increased interferon gamma production).
    • Characterize toxicity profiles, since combination treatments may raise the risk for immune-mediated adverse events.
  • Typical experimental approaches:

    • Use of animal models (murine syngeneic tumor models, patient-derived xenografts) expressing HER2, treated with a pertuzumab biosimilar alone or in conjunction with ICIs to observe additive or synergistic effects on tumor regression, immune cell infiltration, and survival.
    • Assessment of immune microenvironment changes by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, or gene expression analysis.
    • Evaluation of tumor growth dynamics and monitoring for systemic toxicity.
  • Checkpoint inhibitors under study: While anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combinations are well documented, the integration of anti-LAG-3 biosimilars is still largely in the experimental and preclinical phase, often tested alongside other established ICIs to dissect multi-checkpoint blockade effects.

Additional relevant information:

  • Most clinical data involving pertuzumab (including biosimilars) focus on HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy, not yet with checkpoint inhibitors in routine practice.
  • Translational research and early phase clinical trials increasingly include combinatorial studies of antibody therapies and ICIs to address resistance and broaden efficacy, but published results on pertuzumab biosimilar plus ICI combinations specifically remain sparse.

In summary, researchers use pertuzumab biosimilars in advanced preclinical and translational immune-oncology models together with checkpoint inhibitors to probe for synergistic tumor immunity, leveraging the accessibility and validated activity of these biosimilars, though robust published data on combinations with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3 biosimilars are still emerging.

A Pertuzumab biosimilar is used in a bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) ELISA by serving as both the capture and/or detection reagent to assess whether a patient has developed antibodies against the therapeutic drug (Pertuzumab or its biosimilar).

How the Bridging ADA ELISA Works (with a Pertuzumab Biosimilar):

  • The classic bridging ELISA leverages the bivalency of antibodies. Most commonly, it operates as follows:
    • Plate Coating (Capture): The microtiter plate is coated with Pertuzumab biosimilar. This immobilized drug binds one arm of any ADA present in the patient's serum.
    • Sample Incubation: Patient serum is added; any ADAs with specificity for Pertuzumab will bind to the drug on the plate.
    • Detection Reagent: After washing, a labeled (e.g., biotinylated or HRP-conjugated) Pertuzumab biosimilar is added. This detection drug binds to the remaining free arm of the ADA, forming a “bridge” between the capture and detection drug.
    • Visualization: A detection system (such as HRP and TMB substrate if HRP-conjugated detection drug is used) allows quantification of bound ADA based on color change.

Result Interpretation:

  • A signal indicates the presence of anti-Pertuzumab antibodies in the patient sample—evidence of an immune response against the therapeutic drug.

Use of Biosimilar in the Assay:

  • The Pertuzumab biosimilar can be used instead of the reference product as the capture/detection reagent if it is structurally and functionally equivalent to the reference drug. This is appropriate when the biosimilar and the reference product are shown to be highly similar in terms of immunogenic epitopes—ensuring that ADAs against the original drug will also be detected by the biosimilar in the assay.
  • If the ADA response is being assessed specifically for the biosimilar, then using the biosimilar in both positions ensures specificity for anti-biosimilar responses.

Why Use the Biosimilar for ADA Detection:

  • Using the biosimilar in the ELISA is particularly important in clinical trials that monitor the immunogenicity of the biosimilar itself, rather than just cross-reactive ADAs to the reference product. This is to confirm that the biosimilar does not elicit a significantly different ADA profile than the reference molecule.

Essential Details:

  • Sensitivity and specificity of this ELISA format depend on the similarity of the biosimilar to the reference drug and the quality of the labeling/immobilization process.
  • Controls must be used (samples lacking the drug, positive ADA controls) to ensure assay validity.

Summary Table: Key Steps in Bridging ADA ELISA Using Pertuzumab Biosimilar

StepReagentRole
CoatingPertuzumab biosimilarCapture ADA in patient sample
IncubationPatient serumSource of possible ADAs
DetectionLabeled Pertuzumab biosimilarDetect ADAs bound to capture drug
VisualizationHRP substrateReport binding via colorimetric readout

In summary: A Pertuzumab biosimilar, when used as both capture and detection reagent in a bridging ADA ELISA, allows for monitoring the patient’s immune response against the therapeutic drug by directly detecting ADAs that bind to the biosimilar or the reference molecule. This approach is a well-established, sensitive method to assess immunogenicity in clinical studies of biosimilars.

References & Citations

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2064
2. Dean L, Kane M. Pertuzumab Therapy and ERBB2 Genotype. 2015 Sep 10 [Updated 2021 Jan 21]. In: Pratt VM, Scott SA, Pirmohamed M, et al., editors. Medical Genetics Summaries [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2012-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK315949/
3. Metzger-Filho O, Winer EP, Krop I. Clin Cancer Res. 19(20):5552-5556. 2013.
4. Franklin MC, Carey KD, Vajdos FF, et al. Cancer Cell. 5(4):317-328. 2004.
5. Hughes JB, Berger C, Rødland MS, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 8(7):1885-1892. 2009.
6. Keating GM. Drugs. 72(3):353-360. 2012.
7. Adams CW, Allison DE, Flagella K, et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 55(6):717-727. 2006.
8. Roskoski R Jr. Pharmacol Res. 79:34-74. 2014.
9. Tanner M, Kapanen AI, Junttila T, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 3(12):1585-1592. 2004.
10. Friess T, Scheuer W, Hasmann M. Clin Cancer Res. 11(14):5300-5309. 2005.
11. Nahta R, Yuan LX, Zhang B, et al. Cancer Res. 65(23):11118-11128. 2005.
12. Erjala K, Sundvall M, Junttila TT, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 12(13):4103-4111. 2006.
13. Arpino G, Gutierrez C, Weiss H, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99(9):694-705. 2007.
14. Osipo C, Meeke K, Cheng D, et al. Int J Oncol. 30(2):509-520. 2007.
15. Sakai K, Yokote H, Murakami-Murofushi K, et al. Cancer Sci. 98(9):1498-1503. 2007.
16. Nagumo Y, Faratian D, Mullen P, et al. Mol Cancer Res. 7(9):1563-1571. 2009.
17. Scheuer W, Friess T, Burtscher H, et al. Cancer Res. 69(24):9330-9336. 2009.
18. Sak MM, Szymanska M, Bertelsen V, et al. Carcinogenesis. 34(9):2031-2038. 2013.
19. Yamashita-Kashima Y, Shu S, Harada N, et al. Oncol Rep. 30(3):1087-1093. 2013.
20. Zahnd C, Pecorari F, Straumann N, et al. J Biol Chem. 281(46):35167-35175. 2006.
21. Fábián Á, Horváth G, Vámosi G, et al. Cytometry A. 83(4):375-385. 2013.
Indirect Elisa Protocol
FA
N

Certificate of Analysis

- -
- -

Formats Available

- -
- -
Disclaimer AlertProducts are for research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.