Anti-Mouse CD22 (Clone MB22-11) – Purified in vivo PLATINUM™ Functional Grade
Anti-Mouse CD22 (Clone MB22-11) – Purified in vivo PLATINUM™ Functional Grade
Product No.: C961
Clone MB22-11 Target CD22 Formats AvailableView All Product Type Hybridoma Monoclonal Antibody Alternate Names Lyb-8, Siglec-2, BL-CAM Isotype Mouse IgG2c κ Applications ELISA , FA |
Antibody DetailsProduct DetailsReactive Species Mouse Host Species Mouse Recommended Dilution Buffer Immunogen Mouse CD22 cDNA-transfected baby hamster kidney cells Product Concentration ≥ 5.0 mg/ml Endotoxin Level ≤ 0.5 EU/mg as determined by the LAL method Purity ≥95% by SDS Page ⋅ ≥98% monomer by analytical SEC Formulation This monoclonal antibody is aseptically packaged and formulated in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (150 mM NaCl) PBS pH 7.2 - 7.4 with no carrier protein, potassium, calcium or preservatives added. Due to inherent biochemical properties of antibodies, certain products may be prone to precipitation over time. Precipitation may be removed by aseptic centrifugation and/or filtration. State of Matter Liquid Product Preparation Functional grade preclinical antibodies are manufactured in an animal free facility using in vitro cell culture techniques and are purified by a multi-step process including the use of protein A or G to assure extremely low levels of endotoxins, leachable protein A or aggregates. Storage and Handling Functional grade preclinical antibodies may be stored sterile as received at 2-8°C for up to one month. For longer term storage, aseptically aliquot in working volumes without diluting and store at ≤ -70°C. Avoid Repeated Freeze Thaw Cycles. Regulatory Status Research Use Only Country of Origin USA Shipping 2-8°C Wet Ice Additional Applications Reported In Literature ? ELISA, FA Each investigator should determine their own optimal working dilution for specific applications. See directions on lot specific datasheets, as information may periodically change. DescriptionDescriptionSpecificity MB22-11 activity is directed against mouse CD22 (Siglec-2). Background Siglecs (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin superfamily lectins) are a family of single pass, transmembrane cell surface proteins characterized by shared structural motifs and an ability to recognize sialic acids1, 2. CD22 (Siglec-2), a 140 kDa member of the Siglec family expressed by B cells3, 4, contains six C2-set domains, one V-set domain, and in its intracellular cytoplasmic tail has three immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIM) and one ITIM-like domain5. While murine Siglecs are not necessarily homologous to human Siglecs, CD22 is evolutionarily conserved and does have a direct human ortholog5. CD22 acts as an inhibitory B cell co-receptor that negatively regulates B cell activation, B reg cell expansion, and B cell receptor (BCR) signaling4. Upon ligation of BCR, ITIMs are phosphorylated, leading to recruitment and activation of SH2-containing phosphatases that then dephosphorylate signaling molecules activated by BCR ligation4. Additionally, CD22 regulates B cell response to inflammation and is a master regulator of microglial phagocytosis in the aging brain5. Evidence in mouse models suggests CD22 contributes to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases3. Loss of CD22 leads to hyperactivation of B cells5. CD22 mouse knockouts are defective in B cell development but do not develop lupus-like disease4. To generate MB22-11, CD22 knockout mice were immunized with mouse CD22 cDNA-transfected baby hamster kidney cells6. Spleen cells were fused with NS-1 myeloma cells, and hybridomas producing antibody specifically reactive with CD22-transfected mouse L cells were selected and purified. MB22-11 was isotyped as IgG2c due to its C57BL/6 origin; however, both IgG2a and IgG2c specific reagents have significant reactivity against MB22-11. In vitro, MB22-11 inhibits CD22-mediated adhesion by 90% and completely blocks CD22-Fc binding to T and B cells6. In vivo, MB22-11 significantly reduces peripheral blood, lymph node, and marginal zone B cell numbers6, 7. Additionally, in mice injected with MB22-11, blood, spleen, and lymph node B cell turnover is higher relative to injection with non-blocking monoclonal antibodies, and B cell surface expression of CD22 is reduced to nearly undetectable levels6. Antigen Distribution CD22 is expressed by most mature B cell lineages. Ligand/Receptor SHP-1, Syk, Lck, and Lyn NCBI Gene Bank ID UniProt.org Research Area Cell Adhesion . Immunology Leinco Antibody AdvisorPowered by AI: AI is experimental and still learning how to provide the best assistance. It may occasionally generate incorrect or incomplete responses. Please do not rely solely on its recommendations when making purchasing decisions or designing experiments. The clone MB22-11, which is a mouse anti-mouse CD22 monoclonal antibody, is commonly used in in vivo applications involving mice for several purposes:
These applications highlight the versatility of the MB22-11 clone in mouse models for immunological and pathological research. The most commonly used antibodies and proteins associated with MB22-11 (anti-mouse CD22) in the literature include:
MB22-11 is primarily a tool in murine immunology, focusing on B cell biology, depletion strategies, and signaling mechanisms. Its combination with the above antibodies or proteins is fundamental for validating experimental findings, dissecting molecular pathways, and ensuring assay specificity. Key findings from scientific literature on clone MB22-11 (anti-mouse CD22 mAb) center on its ability to efficiently deplete specific B cell populations in mice, elucidate CD22’s biological role, and its distinct mechanism of action compared to anti-CD20 antibodies. Essential findings:
Comparison to anti-CD20 antibodies:
These findings establish MB22-11 as a valuable experimental tool for dissecting B cell biology, the function of CD22, and related immune processes in murine models. Dosing Regimens of Clone MB22-11 in Mouse ModelsClone MB22-11 (anti-mouse CD22) is widely used to study B cell biology, depletion, and signaling in vivo, but detailed information on dosing regimens across different mouse models is limited in the literature. Here’s what can be summarized from the available evidence: General Dosing ConsistencyDosing regimens of MB22-11 are generally consistent across various mouse models, such as NZB/W F1 and C57BL/6, with adjustments primarily based on experimental objectives and desired duration of B cell depletion rather than differences in mouse strain. This suggests that strain-specific pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics do not play a major role in altering the effective dose. Example Dose and EfficacyA single dose of MB22-11 (100 μg) has been shown to deplete mature recirculating bone marrow, blood, and marginal zone B cells comparably in both NZB/W F1 and C57BL/6 mice. Specifically, depletion rates for these B cell subsets were similar between the two models, indicating that the same dose can be effective in different genetic backgrounds. Experimental Factors Influencing DosingWhile there is no evidence of intrinsic model-based differences in MB22-11-induced B cell depletion, dosing may still vary depending on:
Key Points
Summary Table
ConclusionDosing of clone MB22-11 is generally consistent across mouse models, with a standard single dose (e.g., 100 μg) producing comparable B cell depletion in different strains. Adjustments to the regimen are driven by experimental needs rather than intrinsic differences between mouse models. Researchers should confirm dosing in the context of their specific experimental endpoints and consider pilot studies if prolonged or repeated depletion is desired. References & Citations1. Bochner BS. Clin Exp Allergy. 39(3):317-324. 2009. 2. Kiwamoto T, Kawasaki N, Paulson JC, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 135(3):327-336. 2012. 3. Dörner T, Shock A, Smith KG. Int Rev Immunol. 31(5):363-378. 2012. 4. Tsubata T. Immunol Med. 42(3):108-116. 2019. 5. Siddiqui SS, Matar R, Merheb M, et al. Cells. 8(10):1125. 2019. 6. Haas KM, Sen S, Sanford IG, et al. J Immunol. 177(5):3063-3073. 2006. 7. Haas KM, Watanabe R, Matsushita T, et al. J Immunol. 184(9):4789-4800. 2010. Technical ProtocolsCertificate of Analysis |
Formats Available
