Scl-AbII is the murine IgG1 parent. Immunogen unknown.
Product Concentration
≥ 5.0 mg/ml
Endotoxin Level
≤ 1.0 EU/mg as determined by the LAL method
Purity
≥95% by SDS Page
⋅
≥95% monomer by analytical SEC
Formulation
This biosimilar antibody is aseptically packaged and formulated in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (150 mM NaCl) PBS pH 7.2 - 7.4 with no carrier protein, potassium, calcium or preservatives added. Due to inherent biochemical properties of antibodies, certain products may be prone to precipitation over time. Precipitation may be removed by aseptic centrifugation and/or filtration.
State of Matter
Liquid
Product Preparation
Recombinant biosimilar antibodies are manufactured in an animal free facility using only in vitro protein free cell culture techniques and are purified by a multi-step process including the use of protein A or G to assure extremely low levels of endotoxins, leachable protein A or aggregates.
Pathogen Testing
To protect mouse colonies from infection by pathogens and to assure that experimental preclinical data is not affected by such pathogens, all of Leinco’s recombinant biosimilar antibodies are tested and guaranteed to be negative for all pathogens in the IDEXX IMPACT I Mouse Profile.
Storage and Handling
Functional grade preclinical antibodies may be stored sterile as received at 2-8°C for up to one month. For longer term storage, aseptically aliquot in working volumes without diluting and store at ≤ -70°C. Avoid Repeated Freeze Thaw Cycles.
Each investigator should determine their own optimal working dilution for specific applications. See directions on lot specific datasheets, as information may periodically change.
Description
Description
Specificity
This non-therapeutic biosimilar antibody uses the same variable region sequence as
the therapeutic antibody Romosozumab. AMG785 (Romosozumab) activity is directed against
human and cynomolgus monkey sclerostin (SOST).
Background
SOST (sclerostin) is a secreted glycoprotein that acts as a negative regulator of bone growth via
inhibition of Wnt signaling1. SOST functions by blocking LRP5/6 co-receptors and binding to
LRP42. SOST is expressed in the developing embryo, where it is involved in limb patterning1.
Dysregulation of SOST is associated with numerous diseases including postmenopausal
osteoporosis2, osteoarthritis1, ankylosing spondylitis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Mutations are
also associated with inherited high bone mass conditions involving excessive bone formation,
such as sclerosteosis, craniodiaphyseal dysplasia, and Van Buchem Disease2. SOST has also
been observed in bone tumors and bone cancer cell lines1. Monoclonal antibodies can be used to
target SOST and promote new bone formation.
AMG785 (Romosozumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody against SOST that was
developed for the treatment of osteoporosis3. Romosozumab was generated as a high-affinity
PEGylated antibody fragment against SOST using the Selected Lymphocyte Antibody Method
(SLAM) along with proprietary antibody fragment technologies. Scl-AbII is the murine IgG1
SOST-neutralizing parent antibody. The humanized version Scl-AbIV induces a dose-dependent
increase in bone mineral density in cynomolgus monkeys4. Additionally, Romosozumab leads to
increased bone mineral density in humans5,6,7,8.
Antigen Distribution
SOST production at the protein level has been confirmed in osteocytes,
osteosarcomas, osteoclasts, hypertrophic chondrocytes, articular cartilage-osteoarthritis,
cementocytes, multiple myeloma (MM) patient CD138+ plasma cells and human MM cell lines,
breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, prostate cancer, and aortic valves in areas adjacent to
calcification in hemodialysis patients.
Powered by AI: AI is experimental and still learning how to provide the best assistance. It may occasionally generate incorrect or incomplete responses. Please do not rely solely on its recommendations when making purchasing decisions or designing experiments.
Research-grade Romosozumab biosimilars are typically used as analytical standards or reference controls in pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging ELISA assays to accurately quantify drug concentrations in serum samples during biosimilar development and comparability studies.
Key points on their use:
Analytical Standard/Calibrator: A single biosimilar standard (the research-grade biosimilar) is used as the calibrator to generate the standard curve in the ELISA, against which unknown serum sample concentrations are interpolated. This standard is often lyophilized Romosozumab biosimilar that has been well-characterized for purity and concentration.
PK Bridging ELISA Rationale: Using a single, well-qualified analytical standard minimizes variability and ensures that both the biosimilar candidate and reference (originator) product are measured equivalently. This approach is aligned with regulatory guidance for bioanalytical comparability, enabling direct comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles.
Quality Control (QC) Samples: QC samples are independently prepared with both the biosimilar and reference product at known concentrations, but these samples are always quantified against the biosimilar-derived calibration curve. This step confirms that the assay can measure both forms equivalently and with the required accuracy and precision.
Validation: Validation of the assay includes measuring multiple concentrations of both the biosimilar and reference products in human serum to confirm that the biosimilar calibrator provides accuracy and precision for both materials. Analytical equivalence is evaluated using statistical criteria (e.g., 90% confidence interval falls within a specified equivalence boundary, such as 0.8–1.25 for mean concentration ratios).
Assay Operation: In routine sample analysis, the ELISA plate is coated with capture antibody specific to Romosozumab, standards and unknowns are applied, and a detection antibody is used for readout. Drug concentration in patient serum samples is extrapolated from the standard curve made with the research-grade biosimilar, ensuring consistent measurement between study batches.
Summary Table: Role of Romosozumab Biosimilar in PK Bridging ELISA
Application
Role of Biosimilar Standard
Rationale
Calibration standard
Establishes standard curve
Ensures both biosimilar and reference measured equivalently
Quality controls
Prepares QC samples with both products
Confirms assay performance for both products
Validation
Demonstrates accuracy/equivalence
Satisfies regulatory/PK bridging requirements
In practice: A research-grade Romosozumab biosimilar lot, fully characterized and traceable, is reconstituted and serially diluted to generate a standard curve (e.g., 0.781–50 ng/mL or 125–8000 ng/mL depending on the kit). Patient serum samples containing unknown drug concentrations are then assayed in the same plate and their concentrations read from this standard curve.
This approach is critical for demonstrating bioanalytical comparability as required for biosimilar PK studies, supporting regulatory submission and ultimately demonstrating biosimilarity.
The primary in vivo models where a research-grade anti-Sclerostin (SOST) antibody is administered to study tumor growth inhibition and characterize tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are syngeneic mouse tumor models and, less frequently, xenograft models in immunocompromised mice. Humanized mouse models are not reported in the provided literature for this purpose.
Key details:
Syngeneic models: These involve transplanting murine tumor cells (e.g., 4T1, E0771/Bone) into immunocompetent mice of the same genetic background (such as C57BL/6), allowing for evaluation of immune responses, including TIL profiling, after anti-sclerostin antibody treatment. For example, E0771/Bone cells (C57BL/6 origin) have been inoculated into both wild-type and Sost-deficient C57BL/6 mice, as well as wild-type mice treated with anti-sclerostin antibodies. These models are commonly used for immunotherapy studies and TIL analyses because they maintain an intact, fully functional murine immune system.
Human cancer cell line xenograft models: Tumor cells of human origin (e.g., MDA-MB-231) are injected into immunodeficient mice (e.g., BALB/c-nu/nu nude mice). These models have been used to assess effects of anti-sclerostin antibodies on tumor growth and metastasis, but evaluation of TILs in these models is limited due to the lack of a host adaptive immune system.
Analysis of TILs:Syngeneic models are specifically cited as providing robust platforms for TIL analysis following immunotherapy due to the presence of an intact immune repertoire. While anti-sclerostin antibodies have been tested in these models for effects on tumor growth and metastasis, direct analysis of TIL populations post-treatment is enabled by the model’s immunocompetence.
Humanized models: No evidence from the provided literature supports routine use of humanized (human immune system-engrafted) mouse models for anti-sclerostin antibody testing in this specific tumor immunology context.
Summary Table: Experimental Models for Anti-Sclerostin (SOST) Antibody Studies
Model Type
Tumor Origin
Host Mouse
Immune Status
TIL Analysis
Reference
Syngeneic
Mouse (e.g., E0771/Bone)
Murine (e.g., C57BL/6)
Immunocompetent
Yes
Human xenograft
Human (e.g., MDA-MB-231)
Nude/SCID mice
Immunodeficient
Limited
Humanized
Human
NSG with human cells
Human immune cells
Not reported
References:
Syngeneic models (mouse tumor/mouse host): Main platform for tumor growth and TIL assays after anti-sclerostin antibody administration.
Human xenograft (human tumor/immunocompromised mouse): Limited immunology scope, more for tumor growth/metastasis studies.
Essential insights:
To study both tumor growth inhibition and TILs, syngeneic murine tumor models are primary and best suited for in vivo anti-sclerostin antibody research.
Humanized models are not documented for this antibody in the context cited.
Xenograft models are complementary but unsuitable for full immune cell characterization due to immunodeficiency of the host.
Researchers studying synergistic effects of combined immune-oncology therapies typically use biosimilar checkpoint inhibitors (such as anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3) in conjunction with other targeted agents, but there is no documented use of Romosozumab biosimilar for such purposes in the available literature or preclinical immune-oncology models. Romosozumab targets SOST (sclerostin) and is primarily studied for osteoporosis, not as an immune modulator. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as those targeting CTLA-4 or LAG-3, are combined to enhance antitumor immune responses, typically by overcoming different mechanisms of tumor immune evasion.
Essential Context
Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin (SOST), involved in bone formation, and is primarily used as an osteoporosis agent. It is not a checkpoint inhibitor nor does it directly target immune pathways involved in oncology.
Checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4, anti-LAG-3) act by releasing the brakes on T cells, enhancing immune-mediated tumor cell killing. Combining agents that target different checkpoints can produce additive or synergistic effects, e.g., anti-CTLA-4 (restores T cell priming in lymph nodes) with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (blocks peripheral tumor immune suppression).
Use of Combination Checkpoint Inhibition in Preclinical Models
For synergy studies, researchers use combinations of checkpoint inhibitors in immune-competent mouse models or ex vivo human tumor explants. These experiments typically measure:
Tumor growth inhibition
Immune cell infiltration (flow cytometry/IHC)
Cytokine changes and T cell activation markers
Preclinical studies have found that combining CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or LAG-3 inhibitors can result in greater antitumor efficacy than monotherapy, depending on the non-overlapping mechanisms of immune regulation involved.
Application of Romosozumab Biosimilar
The Romosozumab biosimilar is available for research use only, mainly for functional assays related to bone biology or SOST signaling.
There is no evidence in the available literature or research reagent documentation that Romosozumab or its biosimilar is utilized in immune-oncology models or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors for immune modulation.
Current Evidence for Combination Strategies in Immuno-Oncology
Target Agent
Application in Synergy Studies
Typical Outcome Measures
CTLA-4 inhibitors
Combined with PD-1/PD-L1 or LAG-3 inhibitors
Tumor regression, immune activation
LAG-3 inhibitors
With PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors
Enhanced T cell response, tumor control
No role is documented for sclerostin inhibition (e.g., Romosozumab) in this paradigm.
In summary: There is currently no published use of the Romosozumab biosimilar in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to study synergistic effects in complex immune-oncology models. Synergy studies in this field focus on combining agents targeting immune checkpoints, not bone metabolism pathways.
A Romosozumab biosimilar can be used as the capture and/or detection reagent in a bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) ELISA to monitor a patient’s immune response against the therapeutic drug. In this assay format, Romosozumab biosimilar is used to detect antibodies in patient serum that bind to the therapeutic, indicating immunogenicity.
Context and Protocol Overview:
Bridging ADA ELISA is a common method for immunogenicity testing of monoclonal antibody drugs, including biosimilars and reference products.
The assay leverages the ability of patient-derived ADA to simultaneously bind two identical antigen molecules (here, the Romosozumab biosimilar), "bridging" capture and detection reagents.
Key Steps Using Romosozumab Biosimilar:
The biosimilar Romosozumab is immobilized on the ELISA plate (capture reagent).
Patient serum is added; any ADA specific to Romosozumab will bind this immobilized biosimilar.
After washing, the plate is incubated with Romosozumab biosimilar conjugated with a detection label (such as biotin or HRP).
ADA in the patient serum binds both the immobilized and the labeled Romosozumab biosimilar, forming a "bridge".
The resulting complex enables colorimetric signal generation upon addition of substrate, which is measured spectrophotometrically.
Assay Principle Table:
Assay Component
Role
Romosozumab (biosimilar, coated)
Captures patient ADA from serum
Patient Serum
Source of ADA against Romosozumab
Romosozumab (biosimilar, labeled)
Detects bound ADA via bridging mechanism
Colorimetric substrate
Reveals presence of bridging complex
Why Use a Biosimilar?
The Romosozumab biosimilar will closely mimic the reference therapeutic drug's epitopes, ensuring detection of ADAs that target clinically relevant regions. This is critical for monitoring immunogenicity in patients treated either with the biosimilar or the reference product.
Supporting Details:
This format is widely used for ADA detection as it specifically measures antibodies that recognize two identical binding sites on the therapeutic molecule, an essential hallmark of the immune response to biologics.
Validation is required to ensure that the biosimilar does not introduce novel epitopes and that assay sensitivity and specificity match the intended clinical context.
Additional Notes:
Such assays can experience interference from free drug present in patient samples (Romosozumab circulating in serum), which blocks ADA binding and leads to potential false negatives.
Protocols may incorporate acid dissociation or other steps to minimize drug interference, enhancing sensitivity and reliability.
In summary, Romosozumab biosimilar serves as both the capture and detection reagent in a bridging ADA ELISA, enabling robust measurement of immune responses against the drug by detecting anti-Romosozumab antibodies in patient samples.
References & Citations
1 Weivoda MM, Youssef SJ, Oursler MJ. Bone. 96:45-50. 2017.
2 Martínez-Gil N, Roca-Ayats N, Cozar M, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 22(2):489. 2021.
3 Markham A. Drugs. 79(4):471-476. 2019.
4 Ominsky MS, Vlasseros F, Jolette J, et al. J Bone Miner Res. 25(5):948-959. 2010.
5 Padhi D, Jang G, Stouch B, et al. J Bone Miner Res. 26(1):19-26. 2011.
6 McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, et al. N Engl J Med. 370(5):412-420. 2014.
7 Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, et al. N Engl J Med. 375(16):1532-1543. 2016.
8 Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, et al. Lancet. 390(10102):1585-1594. 2017.