Anti-Mouse EpCAM (CD326) [Clone G8.8] — Purified in vivo GOLDTM Functional Grade

Anti-Mouse EpCAM (CD326) [Clone G8.8] — Purified in vivo GOLDTM Functional Grade

Product No.: C724

- -
- -
Clone
G8.8
Target
CD326
Formats AvailableView All
Product Type
Hybridoma Monoclonal Antibody
Alternate Names
EGP314
Isotype
Rat IgG2a κ
Applications
FC
,
IF
,
IHC
,
IP
,
WB

- -
- -
Select Product Size
- -
- -

Antibody Details

Product Details

Reactive Species
Mouse
Host Species
Rat
Recommended Isotype Controls
Recommended Isotype Controls
Recommended Dilution Buffer
Immunogen
TE-71 thymic epithelial cell line
Product Concentration
≥ 5.0 mg/ml
Endotoxin Level
< 1.0 EU/mg as determined by the LAL method
Purity
≥95% by SDS Page
≥95% monomer by analytical SEC
Formulation
This monoclonal antibody is aseptically packaged and formulated in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (150 mM NaCl) PBS pH 7.2 - 7.4 with no carrier protein, potassium, calcium or preservatives added. Due to inherent biochemical properties of antibodies, certain products may be prone to precipitation over time. Precipitation may be removed by aseptic centrifugation and/or filtration.
State of Matter
Liquid
Product Preparation
Functional grade preclinical antibodies are manufactured in an animal free facility using only in vitro protein free cell culture techniques and are purified by a multi-step process including the use of protein A or G to assure extremely low levels of endotoxins, leachable protein A or aggregates.
Storage and Handling
Functional grade preclinical antibodies may be stored sterile as received at 2-8°C for up to one month. For longer term storage, aseptically aliquot in working volumes without diluting and store at ≤ -70°C. Avoid Repeated Freeze Thaw Cycles.
Regulatory Status
Research Use Only
Country of Origin
USA
Shipping
2-8°C Wet Ice
Additional Applications Reported In Literature ?
IHC,
IF,
FC,
IP,
WB
Each investigator should determine their own optimal working dilution for specific applications. See directions on lot specific datasheets, as information may periodically change.

Description

Description

Specificity
G8.8 activity is directed against mouse EpCAM (CD326) and does not recognize human or rat EpCAM.
Background
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; also known as CD326 or Tacstd1) is a 40 kDa type I transmembrane glycoprotein composed of an extracellular domain, single transmembrane domain, and the intracellular domain Ep1CD1. EpCAM functions in cell adhesion, signaling, differentiation, migration, proliferation, formation and maintenance of organ morphology, and morphogenic movements during gastrulation. Additionally, EpCAM is essential for cell junctions; the AxxxG motif in the transmembrane domain of EpCAM associates directly with claudin-7, an important tight junction protein. EpCAM also suppresses or enhances E-cadherin function depending on the context of the interaction. Mutant animal models have been developed in mouse (at least four global EpCAM knockout types and one conditional knockout), zebrafish, and Xenopus.

Dysregulation and/or mutations are associated with congenital tufting enteropathy (CTE), which causes lethal diarrhea in newborns, cholestatic liver diseases, and cancer1. EpCAM promotes the proliferation of tumors, is involved in tumorigenesis and metastasis, and EpCAM positive cells serve as cancer stem cells for various human cancers. Therapeutic approaches targeting EpCAM are under development to eliminate chemotherapeutic drug resistance in cancer stem cells by conjugating cancer stem cells targeting EpCAM aptamer with a chemotherapeutic drug. Additionally, EpCAM antibody sensitizes chemoresistant myeloid leukemia to innate immune cells, and EpCAM peptide-primed dendritic cell vaccinations exhibit anti-tumor immunity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Monoclonal antibody G8.8 was raised against glycoconjugates isolated from the TE-71 mouse thymic epithelial cell line2. Splenic cell suspensions were fused with X63-Ag8.653 cells and the resulting hybridomas were screened on frozen Balb/c thymus.
Antigen Distribution
EpCAM is expressed in many epithelial tissues from very early embryos to adult animals and is a cell surface marker on various stem and progenitor cells. EpCAM is also an important carcinoma marker highly expressed on a variety of carcinomas, including epithelial tumors and acute myeloid leukemia. EpCAM is enriched in the basolateral membrane of mouse and human intestinal epithelium and is localized to tight junctions, adherens junctions, and the lateral membranes of epithelial cells lining the intestines.
Ligand/Receptor
LAIR-1 (CD305) and LAIR-2 (CD306)
NCBI Gene Bank ID
UniProt.org
Research Area
Cell Adhesion
.
Immunology

Leinco Antibody Advisor

Powered by AI: AI is experimental and still learning how to provide the best assistance. It may occasionally generate incorrect or incomplete responses. Please do not rely solely on its recommendations when making purchasing decisions or designing experiments.

Common in Vivo Applications of Clone G8.8 in Mice

Clone G8.8 is a rat monoclonal antibody with high specificity for mouse EpCAM (CD326), a cell-surface glycoprotein prominently expressed in epithelial and thymic epithelial cells. Its in vivo applications are primarily focused on cell identification, isolation, and functional manipulation.

Cell Population Identification and Isolation

  • Isolation and Purification: G8.8 is widely used to isolate and purify mouse thymic epithelial cells and other EpCAM-expressing (EpCAM+) cell populations in vivo, leveraging techniques such as flow cytometry and magnetic bead-based cell sorting. This enables researchers to selectively enrich epithelial cell subsets from complex tissues for downstream analysis.
  • Marker Studies: The antibody is employed to identify and localize alveolar progenitor and stem cells in the mouse lung in vivo, mapping their activity and distribution during development and regeneration.

Functional Manipulation and Therapy

  • CAR-T Cell Engineering: The single-chain variable fragment (scFv) from G8.8 is used to construct mouse EpCAM-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. These CAR-T cells are then adoptively transferred into mice to study in vivo targeting and anti-tumor efficacy against EpCAM-expressing malignancies.
  • Exclusion of Human and Rat EpCAM: G8.8 specifically recognizes mouse EpCAM and does not cross-react with human or rat homologs, making it ideal for murine-specific in vivo studies.

Key Experimental Techniques

  • Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting: G8.8 is routinely used for in vivo and ex vivo flow cytometric analysis and cell sorting to identify, quantify, and isolate EpCAM+ cells from mouse tissues.
  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Immunofluorescence (IF): The antibody is also employed for in situ visualization of EpCAM expression in tissue sections, providing spatial information about epithelial cell distribution.
  • In Vivo Depletion and Functional Studies: Some protocols may use G8.8 for in vivo antibody-mediated depletion of EpCAM+ cells to study their functional roles in organogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and disease models, although the referenced materials primarily emphasize isolation and engineering applications.

Summary Table

ApplicationDescriptionReferences
Cell isolation/purificationEnrichment of thymic epithelial and other EpCAM+ cells in vivo
Cell identification/localizationMapping of alveolar progenitors and stem cells in lung in vivo
CAR-T cell engineeringGeneration of mouse EpCAM-specific CAR-T cells for tumor targeting
Flow cytometry/cell sortingIdentification and isolation of EpCAM+ populations from tissues
IHC/IFSpatial visualization of EpCAM expression in tissue sections

Conclusion

Clone G8.8 is a versatile reagent central to the study of murine epithelial biology in vivo, with main uses in cell isolation, phenotyping, functional manipulation (e.g., CAR-T therapy), and spatial mapping of epithelial cell populations. Its strict specificity for mouse EpCAM ensures reliable results in murine models without cross-reactivity with human or rat tissues.

Commonly used antibodies or proteins with G8.8 (anti-mouse EpCAM/CD326) in the literature include markers for immune and epithelial cell identification, particularly in immunophenotyping, tissue characterization, and cell isolation experiments.

Commonly co-used antibodies:

  • CD3: T cell marker
  • CD45: pan-leukocyte marker
  • CD4: helper T cell marker
  • CD8: cytotoxic T cell marker
  • CD19: B cell marker

These antibodies are frequently used alongside G8.8 in studies involving lymphocyte subset identification and characterization, especially in mucosal immunology and cancer research. In such studies, G8.8 is used to label epithelial cells, while the additional markers help classify and quantify various leukocyte populations in the same sample.

Other proteins and reagents:

  • E-cadherin and other epithelial cell markers are often employed in conjunction with EpCAM staining to further delineate epithelial cell subtypes, though EpCAM (G8.8) is typically the primary epithelial marker in mouse tissues.
  • Viability dyes are also commonly used for accurate cell counting and exclusion of dead cells during flow cytometry and cell sorting.

Sample usage contexts:

  • Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry studies, where immune cell infiltrates within epithelial tissues are identified using panels containing G8.8 together with the above immune cell markers.
  • Cell isolation from tissues, where epithelial cells (EpCAM+) are separated from leukocytes (CD45+, CD3+, etc.) using combinations of these antibodies.

In summary, G8.8 is most often paired with antibodies against CD3, CD45, CD4, CD8, and CD19 in studies focused on mouse epithelial and immune cell interactions or tissue profiling.

Clone G8.8 is a well-established rat monoclonal antibody against mouse EpCAM (CD326), widely cited in scientific literature for its specificity and utility in immunological and epithelial cell research.

Key findings and uses from the literature:

  • Specificity: G8.8 specifically recognizes murine (mouse) EpCAM (CD326) and does not cross-react with human or rat EpCAM.
  • Applications: The antibody has been routinely used for:
    • Flow cytometry (FACS) to identify and sort epithelial and thymic epithelial cells.
    • Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) for tissue staining, commonly of frozen sections.
    • Immunoprecipitation (IP) and Western blotting for protein studies and cell isolation.
  • Biological insights enabled:
    • Cell sorting and purification: G8.8 has enabled highly specific purification of mouse epithelial and thymic epithelial cells for downstream applications.
    • Developmental biology: It has facilitated studies on thymic development and stem cell biology, with citations in stem cell research (e.g., Fischedick et al., Stem Cell Res. 2014).
    • Immunology: Frequently used for characterization of epithelial progenitors, and immune cell interactions in mouse models.
    • Tissue engineering/regeneration: G8.8 is referenced in research on tissue engineering and epithelial cell regeneration (e.g., Walmsley et al., Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015).
  • Technical details:
    • Isotype: Rat IgG2a.
    • Epitope: Targets a conformational epitope on the extracellular domain of murine EpCAM.
    • Performance: Not recommended for detection of human or rat EpCAM as no cross-reactivity has been observed.
    • Hybridoma availability: The G8.8 hybridoma is widely available through repositories such as the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB).
  • Citations: Key publications that define and repeatedly utilize clone G8.8 include:
    • PMID:8617310 (defining citation)
    • PMID:16177073
    • PMID:8566052
    • PMID:2016514
    • Numerous more recent citations across developmental, immunological, and regenerative biology journals.

Summary of impact:
G8.8 is a foundational tool in mouse epithelial cell biology, facilitating a wide range of applications from cell sorting to immunophenotyping, and is referenced extensively for murine-specific studies of EpCAM function, development, and disease.

Dosing regimens of clone G8.8 (a rat monoclonal antibody to mouse EpCAM/CD326) are not standardized across mouse models; they are typically determined empirically and tailored to the experimental context. There is no widely published universal in vivo dosing protocol for clone G8.8, and dose, route, and frequency can differ based on the intended application (e.g., flow cytometry vs. functional in vivo studies) and mouse strain.

Key context and supporting details:

  • Empirical Optimization: Dosing is often optimized based on experimental requirements, with each lab or study potentially using different concentrations, injection schedules, and routes depending on the goal (e.g., cell depletion, blocking, or detection).
  • Typical Laboratory Usage: For flow cytometry and ex vivo applications, recommendations are around ≤0.06–0.25 µg per million cells in 100 µl, with titration suggested for best performance. These recommendations do not translate directly to in vivo systemic dosing.
  • Dosing in Mouse Models: No published source provides a standard in vivo dose for clone G8.8 comparable to common depleting antibodies (like anti-CD4 or anti-CD8), which are often used at 100–300 µg/mouse via intraperitoneal injection. For G8.8, in vivo dosing is usually determined based on factors such as:
    • Mouse strain and immunological status (e.g., wild-type vs. immunodeficient)
    • Application (cell tracking, targeting, or depletion)
    • Experimental endpoints (e.g., duration of effect, need for repeated administration).
  • Supplier Recommendations: Manufacturers and suppliers also refrain from specifying in vivo dosing, instead advising that end-users titrate for optimal effect in their model.

In summary, dosing regimens for clone G8.8 vary and should be empirically optimized for each mouse model and research application. There is no evidence of a universal or commonly accepted protocol in the literature or major supplier documentation. If using clone G8.8 in vivo, pilot titration to assess efficacy and toxicity in the specific experimental and mouse context is strongly recommended.

References & Citations

1. Huang L, Yang Y, Yang F, et al. Int J Mol Med. 42(4):1771-1785. 2018.
2. Farr A, Nelson A, Truex J, et al. J Histochem Cytochem. 39(5):645-653. 1991.
3. Li H, Hsu HC, Wu Q, et al. Nat Commun. 5:4259. 2014.
4. Wang J, Wang D, Chu K, et al. Nat Commun. 10(1):4966. 2019.
5. Martínez LE, Garcia G Jr, Contreras D, et al. J Virol. 94(9):e00067-20. 2020.
6. Petersen B, Wolf M, Austermann J, et al. EMBO J. 32(1):100-111. 2013.
7. Snitow M, Lu M, Cheng L, et al. Development. 143(20):3733-3741. 2016.
8. Kazakevych J, Denizot J, Liebert A, et al. Genome Biol. 21(1):64. 2020.
9. Maaser K, Borlak J. Br J Cancer. 99(10):1635-1643. 2008.
10. Kuan II, Liang KH, Wang YP, et al. Sci Rep. 7:41852. 2017.
11. Kuroki S, Maeda R, Yano M, et al. Stem Cell Reports. 15(2):424-438. 2020.
12. Papadopoulou AS, Dooley J, Linterman MA, et al. Nat Immunol. 13(2):181-187. 2011.
13. Goldman O, Han S, Sourisseau M, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 12(6):748-760. 2013.
14. Shim EJ, Bang BR, Kang SG, et al. J Immunol. 191(5):2764-2770. 2013.
15. de Jong JH, Rodermond HM, Zimberlin CD, et al. Sci Rep. 2:271. 2012.
16. Liu Z, Guo W, Zhang D, et al. Sci Rep. 6:39808. 2016.
17. Freire T, Zhang X, Dériaud E, et al. Blood. 116(18):3526-3536. 2010.
18. Naus S, Blanchet MR, Gossens K, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 181(12):1318-1328.2010.
19. Cook BD, Liu S, Evans T. Blood. 16;117(24):6489-6497. 2011.
20. Krishnamurthy B, Chee J, Jhala G et al. Diabetes. 61(2):425-435. 2012.
21. El-Zaatari M, Kao JY, Tessier A, et al. PLoS One. 8(3):e58935. 2013.
22. Magness ST, Puthoff BJ, Crissey MA, et al. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol.305(8):G542-551. 2013.
23. Tata PR, Mou H, Pardo-Saganta A, et al. Nature. 503(7475):218-223. 2013.
24. Fischedick G, Wu G, Adachi K, et al. Stem Cell Res. 13(2):300-315. 2014.
25. Velardi E, Tsai JJ, Holland AM, et al. J Exp Med. 211(12):2341-2349. 2014.
26. Clatworthy MR, Aronin CE, Mathews RJ, et al. Nat Med. 20(12):1458-1463. 2014.
27. Thelemann C, Eren RO, Coutaz M, et al. PLoS One. 9(1):e86844. 2014.
28. Walmsley GG, Rinkevich Y, Hu MS, et al. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 21(3):314-321. 2015.
29. Xia H, Ren X, Bolte CS, et al. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 52(5):611-621. 2015.
30. Goto Y, Lamichhane A, Kamioka M, et al. Sci Rep. 5:15918. 2015.
31. Satoh R, Kakugawa K, Yasuda T, et al. PLoS Genet. 12(1):e1005776. 2016.
32. Shi Y, Wu W, Chai Q, et al. Nat Commun. 7:12369. 2016.
33. Cuccarese MF, Dubach JM, Pfirschke C, et al. Nat Commun. 8:14293. 2017.
34. Yamaji M, Jishage M, Meyer C, et al. Nature. 543(7646):568-572. 2017.
35. Lim JS, Ibaseta A, Fischer MM, et al. Nature. 545(7654):360-364. 2017.
36. Lopes N, Vachon H, Marie J, et al. EMBO Mol Med. 9(6):835-851. 2017.
37. Nikolaidis NM, Noel JG, Pitstick LB, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 114(32):E6613-E6622.2017
38. Koh AS, Miller EL, Buenrostro JD, et al. Nat Immunol. 19(2):162-172. 2018.
39. Lopes N, Charaix J, Cédile O, et al. Nat Commun. 9(1):1262. 2018.
40. Moretti FA, Klapproth S, Ruppert R, et al. Elife. 7:e35816. 2018.
41. Thilakasiri P, Huynh J, Poh AR, et al. EMBO Mol Med. 11(4):e9539. 2019.
42. Glal D, Sudhakar JN, Lu HH, et al. Front Immunol. 9:2522. 2018.
43. Wang X, Yang L, Wang YC, et al. Cell Res. 30(12):1109-1126. 2020.
44. Giraud J, Foroutan M, Boubaker-Vitre J, et al. Transl Oncol. 14(2):101001. 2021.
45. Goga A, Yagabasan B, Herrmanns K, et al. Nat Commun. 12(1):3339. 2021.
46. Mauduit O, Aure MH, Delcroix V, et al. Cell Rep. 39(2):110663. 2022.
47. Ferreirinha P, Pinheiro RGR, Landry JJM, et al. Development. 149(10):dev200513. 2022.
Flow Cytometry
IF
IHC
Immunoprecipitation Protocol
General Western Blot Protocol

Certificate of Analysis

- -
- -
Disclaimer AlertProducts are for research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.